April 11, 2008

You are currently browsing the daily archive for April 11, 2008.

(Via Crooks and Liars.)

About two weeks ago, John McCain, in a high-profile speech, unveiled his response to the mortgage crisis. Despite the seriousness of the issue, the GOP presidential nominee unveiled a classic YOYO policy: “You’re on your own.”

As the New York Times noted shortly after the speech, “The real core of his speech was his argument against government action to help dig distressed homeowners — or the country — out of the mortgage mess…. His suggestion that federal aid might wrongly reward ‘undeserving’ homeowners sounded both mean-spirited and economically naive. And then there is the double standard. He seemed less concerned about the government helping reckless bankers, endorsing its role in preventing the bankruptcy of Bear Stearns.”

Yesterday, in one of the quicker flip-flops in recent memory, McCain reversed course. The Washington Post, apparently anxious to give McCain a hand, said the senator was “refining” and “revising” his plan. That’s enormously generous of the newspaper, but in reality, McCain’s proposal was an embarrassing dud, so he gave up on it.

Senator John McCain, who drew criticism last month after he warned against broad government intervention to solve the deepening mortgage crisis, pivoted Thursday and called for the federal government to aid some homeowners in danger of losing their homes, by helping them to refinance and get federally guaranteed 30-year mortgages.

“There is nothing more important than keeping alive the American dream to own your home, and priority No. 1 is to keep well-meaning, deserving homeowners who are facing foreclosure in their homes,” Mr. McCain said in a speech on economic themes that he gave at a window company in the Bay Ridge section of Brooklyn.

Funny, two weeks ago he thought these same homeowners shouldn’t be “rewarded” for acting “irresponsibly.”

Perhaps the nation’s callous constituency is not quite as large as the McCain campaign had hoped.

Tags: , ,

(Via washingtonpost.com.)

As the Democratic presidential race turns into the political equivalent of the Battle of the Somme, lots of Democrats are glaring at the party’s nominal leader, Howard Dean. The Democratic National Committee chairman (and 2004 White House hopeful) has not been able to force the race to a close or to fix a mess he helped create by tossing out the results of primaries in Michigan and Florida after their state parties violated DNC rules by jumping toward the front of the line in the campaign season. In 2004, Dean famously screamed at Democrats; in 2008, plenty of Democrats are screaming right back.

But Democrats have some good reasons to stop kicking Dean around. You don’t hear the word “prescient” used very often to describe the much-maligned chairman, but one can make a pretty plausible case that his six years on the national Democratic scene have had a significant impact on his party — on machinery, message and methods. If the Democrats win in 2008, they may come to thank Dr. Dean for providing the medicine that cured some of the party’s ills.

Full article here.

Tags: ,

mitt_romney_ok.jpg(Via Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire.)

John Heilemann: “That Mitt Romney wishes to occupy the VP slot on the Republican ticket with John McCain comes as no surprise — but the blatantness of his campaign is highly amusing. As a general rule, the way one goes about these things is to be more or less subtle. You hint. You nudge. You get your pals to lobby quietly, behind the scenes. What you don’t do, for heaven’s sake, is just come out and ask. But basically this is what Romney has done — or, rather, is doing.”

Tags: , ,

(Via Talking Points Memo: by Joshua Micah Marshall.)

We’ve mentioned this before but it remains an interesting dynamic to watch.

You’ve got the John McCain of lore — the maverick riding the Straight Talk Express who flirted with caucusing with the Democrats, if not running with Sen. John Kerry on the Democratic ticket in 2004 — hitching his star to the right-wing noise machine, and the wingnuts hitching their star to him.

It makes for strange bedfellows and for trainwrecks just like this one.

McCain campaign manager Rick Davis sent out a fund-raising letter this week trying to raise money off of George Soros’ funding of indy Dem groups: “He and his group of billionaire left-wing Democrats have pledged $40 million dollars of soft money to smear John McCain in a national television ad campaign,” Davis wrote in the letter.

The problem for McCain is that Soros has also funded groups like the Reform Institute, an advocate of campaign-finance reform that Davis himself served as president of from 2001-05 and for which McCain was honorary co-chairman. As TPM Election Central reports, Soros gave $150,000 to the McCain-Davis outfit back in 2003.

We’re hearing that McCain also benefited indirectly from Soros money that was used for litigation defending the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law.

More on that shortly.

Tags: ,

(Via AMERICAblog: A great nation deserves the truth.)

Let’s just say America isn’t very impressed with Republican economics. Surely the public will be impressed with McCain’s lack of understanding on all economic matters except “reading Greenspan’s book”, “more tax cuts and less regulation” and of course, the Keating Five. What a record…please run with that and let us know how it all works out.

Tags: ,

(Via The Huffington Post | Full News Feed.)

Richard Prince reports that Tavis Smiley is leaving the “Tom Joyner Morning Show”:

After 12 years as a fixture on radio’s syndicated “Tom Joyner Morning Show,” activist, commentator and broadcast personality Tavis Smiley has quit the show, Joyner told listeners on Friday.

“He called me yesterday and said, ‘I quit,’” Joyner said.

Joyner said Smiley told him he was working on too many projects, but believed the real reason was that “he can’t take the hate.

“He can’t take the hate he’s taken over Barack Obama. He’s always busting Barack Obama’s chops. They call. They e-mail. They joke. You know Tavis like I do. He needs to feel loved.

“We’re so emotional about this Barack Obama candidacy. If you don’t say anything for Barack Obama, you’re considered to be a hater. . . . It’s just that it hurts so deep when the people you love don’t agree with you.”

Read the rest of the article here, or read Smiley’s HuffPost blogs here.

Tags: ,

(Via TalkLeft.)

Hillary Clinton outlined her anti-crime proposal in Philadelphia today.

Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton would eliminate the federal mandatory five-year sentence for crack cocaine users as part of a $4 billion-a-year anti-crime initiative designed, in part, to steer many nonviolent offenders away from prison.

Hillary signed as co-sponsor of one of the bills to eliminate the crack cocaine disparity, Joe Biden's S. 1711, some months ago. Obama signed onto the same bill recently. (Note: It is not the pending bill I would have signed onto as it contains too many law enforcement provisions and tougher penalties for other crimes.)

Details of the plan are here. Hillary also calls for funding more cops on the street. As for paying for the $4 billion plan: [More...]

Clinton said she would pay for the $4 billion initiative with savings to be identified by a commission she will assign to “identify unnecessary and outdated corporate subsidies for elimination.” Critics of deficit spending generally urge campaigns to be more specific in saying how they will pay for new programs.

Under Clinton's proposal, states would compete for $1 billion in annual grants to combat recidivism. It would “promote tough but fair” changes to probation practices and to existing programs meant to keep many nonviolent drug offenders out of prison.

The goal is to make punishment more certain for those who violate their probation, she said, while also enhancing efforts to help former drug users stay clean and thereby avoid prison. Clinton said the currently one-fourth of all former inmates who committed nonviolent crimes return to prison “as violent offenders.”

I'll read the plan (as opposed to the AP summary) and report back. I don’t expect to like it, nor do I expect she will differ in any significant way from Obama. Neither is my ideal candidate on these issues.

Tags: , , , ,

(Via Reuters.)

Barack Obama is gaining steadily on Hillary Clinton among Democratic superdelegates, nearly erasing her last advantage in a presidential race where those party insiders could be the ultimate kingmakers.

In a danger sign for Clinton, Obama over the past few months has sharply cut her lead among superdelegates — nearly 800 elected officials and party leaders free to back any candidate.

“Obama has won more delegates, he’s won more votes, he’s raised more money, and now you see it happening with superdelegates too,” said Simon Rosenberg, head of the Democratic advocacy group NDN.

Neither Obama nor Clinton is likely to win enough pledged delegates in state contests to clinch the hard-fought battle for the Democratic presidential nomination, leaving superdelegates to decide the race. The Democratic nominee will face Republican John McCain in the November election.

Despite heavy courting by Clinton, most of the superdelegates who made up their minds since January backed Obama. Clinton’s superdelegate lead dwindled to about 30 from 100 in that time.

A count by MSNBC gives Clinton 256 superdelegates to Obama’s 225. Obama, an Illinois senator, has gained steam in the past month, winning more than two dozen new commitments, compared with a handful for Clinton, a New York senator.

“It has been a drip, drip, drip toward Obama,” said Steven Schier, a political analyst at Carleton College in Minnesota.

“Superdelegates can see Obama’s advantages growing, and it’s pretty clear it’s going to be very hard for Clinton to catch him,” he said. “If Obama notches a few more victories, it could become a stampede.”

Full story here.

Tags: , , ,

Tags: , , ,

(Via LA Times.)

Amid widespread concerns about the nation’s mortgage crisis, John McCain outlined Thursday a proposal to help “well-meaning, deserving homeowners who are facing foreclosure” and called for a Justice Department investigation into possible “criminal wrongdoing” by unscrupulous lenders.

The proposals marked a shift in tone from McCain’s admonition two weeks ago against adopting a mortgage plan that would be “a multibillion-dollar bailout for big banks and speculators.” That set the Arizona senator apart from his Democratic rivals in the presidential contest, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, who have both said there is a need for government intervention to fight the nation’s wave of home mortgage foreclosures and overall economic slowdown.

Related Stories
- Senate passes mortgage relief bill
- White House swayed on mortgage aid
- Q & A: How does WaMu’s financial state affect you?
- Greenspan won’t take rap for housing meltdown
- Who should get mortgage aid?

McCain, in a campaign stop at a windows business in Brooklyn, said, “There is nothing more important than keeping alive the American dream to own your home, and priority No. 1 is to keep well-meaning, deserving homeowners who are facing foreclosure in their homes.”

In advance of his plan to spell out more details about his economic proposals next week, McCain also cited rising gas prices and other hardships for small-business owners and their employees.

“Today our economy is weakening, and as I travel this country and meet and talk with people, I can see how things are getting tougher for many Americans,” he said before sitting down with half a dozen small-business owners to hear their concerns.

Full story here.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Tags: , ,

Tags: , ,

« Older entries